A lifetime transfer agreement passes real property on while the owner is still alive, usually to the next generation. The arrangements range from rights of residence and usufruct through care obligations and compensation payments to siblings, up to reversion clauses — and that variety is precisely why NotarFlow does not yet produce a draft here.
Parties, property, intention. Identity documents and land register extracts are captured just as in any other matter — this part does not depend on the deed type.
This is where it stops. There is no house template for the lifetime transfer, and the catalogue names no fee number for it. NotarFlow produces neither a draft nor an invoice for this transaction.
Unchanged, and yours.
A lifetime transfer of real property is completed in the register; one over movable assets is not. The catalogue says “in part” — the weakest of the three possible statements and the only one that can be evidenced here.
The site is organised by transaction, the pricing by building block. Each block can be booked on its own and works on the same matter; what it costs is on the pricing page and not here.
A variant is the difference you must not guess. Where the deed type catalogue has a line for it, this page says so; where it has none, it says that too.
In the completion papers a notary's office made available to us, the land registry's list of applications names both: registration of a usufruct and registration of a limited personal easement. That is the evidence that this arrangement occurs — it says no more than that.
Evidenced in the same list of applications. For completion this means a further application for registration; for the deed it means a clause that NotarFlow does not know.
The completion sheet in the same papers lists approval by the guardianship court as a step of its own. A completion waiting for an approval is exactly the case the deadline watchdog is built for.
Not completed in the land register. Whether and how often a notary's office notarises this is one of the open questions of the intake interview, and not a figure we invent here.
This section is on every transaction page. Every deed type moves in with your office’s templates — two are ready today, your most frequent one is set up first.
The catalogue entry is empty, and that is a decision: from the papers available a plausible field list could be built — transferor, transferee, property, right of residence, care obligation, compensation payment, reversion clause. It would look like knowledge and would be a guess. The entry exists precisely to prevent that.
A lifetime transfer looks like a notarial procedure over a contract, and that very plausibility is the trap. Which number applies to which arrangement is decided by the notary's own fee calculation and by nobody else. A guessed number would end in an amount a client pays.
That this transaction is the most frequent one in some notary's offices is what we have been told. It is not confirmed, and so there is no percentage on this page.
The papers show what the land registry registers. They do not show which arrangements a notary's office actually notarises — and the chain follows the arrangement.
The first package of material from a notary's office has been reviewed: forty-four sheets of completion papers, a client data sheet and a real fee calculation — but no deed template. It has been requested as a file and once printed-and-scanned. Until it arrives, this entry stays empty.
Seven days at full scope, without a contract and without an account. Feedback from practice on this transaction is worth more to us than a signature.